Multi-configuration shoppers quoted higher
Roughly $1,700 higher
During the January-February campaign, shoppers who explored multiple configurations averaged $6,038 in top quoted value versus $4,289 for single-configuration shoppers.
Shed dealer websites
40 Qualified Shed Leads in Two Months.
This page is based on documented Shed 210 results from San Antonio, Texas. It shows what a real dealer website and configurator captured during the January-February campaign, not theoretical marketing claims.
40
Qualified shed leads
Generated during the January-February Shed 210 campaign.
$196K+
Quoted opportunities
Conservative quoted pipeline during the January-February campaign.
12.5%
Minimum observed close rate
Five documented purchases out of 40 qualified January-February leads.
The problem
Most shed websites only collect contact forms.
Shed buyers do not shop like generic service leads. They compare footprints, roof styles, wall heights, delivery needs, payment range, and add-ons before they are ready to talk.
A plain contact form hides that buying behavior. The dealer gets a lead, but not the project context that helps a salesperson follow up with confidence.
The solution
A website with a shed configurator that captures qualified buyers before they leave.
The configurator can embed into an existing website. A full rebuild is not required when the current site already works as the dealer's main address.
The goal is simple: let buyers build the shed they are considering, then send the dealer a lead with the selected specs attached.
How it works
Three steps from shed shopper to dealer lead.
Step 1
Customer designs their shed
The buyer chooses size, structure type, roof style, wall height, and add-ons before asking for a quote.
Step 2
Customer requests a quote
The request carries the project details a dealer needs for follow-up, not just a name and phone number.
Step 3
Dealer receives the lead
The dealer gets the lead quickly, with the configured shed specs attached.
What 40 shed shoppers taught us
The useful output was buyer behavior, not just lead count.
These are operational insights from the January-February Shed 210 campaign dataset. They help a dealer understand product demand, follow-up priority, and which projects deserve clearer sales paths.
Add-ons changed project value
Roughly $850 higher
During the January-February campaign, configurations with add-ons averaged $5,008 versus $4,158 without add-ons.
8x12 generated the most demand
35 configurations
In the January-February campaign dataset, 8x12 was the highest-volume shed size and represented more than $107K in configured quote value.
Larger sheds carried the highest value
$176K+ configured value
In the January-February campaign dataset, 10x16 and 12x20 together represented more than $176K in configured quote value.
Ownership
The dealer keeps the digital assets and the customer data.
A dealer website should not trap a shed lot inside someone else's platform. The site, domain, leads, and customer data should stay under the dealer's control.
You own your website.
You own your domain.
You own your leads.
You own your customer data.
No platform lock-in.
No long-term contracts.
Proof
Read the full Shed 210 case study before you start.
The case study documents the January-February campaign window, the deduped lead count, the conservative quoted pipeline, and the confirmed tracked customer purchases.
Quote requests included project details for dealer follow-up.
40 qualified leads were counted during the January-February campaign.